General discussion on installation and configuration of SOGo

Text archives Help


Re: [SOGo] Constraints based on group membership


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Martin Rabl < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [SOGo] Constraints based on group membership
  • Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:06:53 +0200

... and a mapping against Database-columns like the other ldap-like named
colums (c_cn etc.), so Constraints could be used with database auth, too.

Greetings,
Martin

Am 26.08.2010 um 02:43 schrieb Martin Lehmann:

> +1
>
> Group memberships for constraints would be really great.
> Now, I've to set an ldap-attribute for every user and feature.
>
> Maybe you want for file a feature request for this:
> http://www.sogo.nu/bugs/bug_report_page.php
>
> Greetz,
> Martin
>
> Am 25.08.2010 19:52, schrieb Daniel Berteaud:
>> Le lundi 09 août 2010 à 16:32 +0800, James Andrewartha a écrit :
>>
>>> I'm in a similar position, except I wanted to not list certain users in
>>> the
>>> address book. I just moved the SOGo users into a new ou=calstaff located
>>> inside ou=People, and told SOGo to use ou=calstaff,ou=People as the search
>>> base. By relying on the DIT structure it is a gross hack, but it works.
>>> Other LDAP things still work fine because they default to search
>>> scope=sub.
>> Unfortunately, I cannot move some of my users in a different ou as my
>> LDAP database is auto-generated (I'm using SME Server distro, which is
>> really great BTW).
>>
>> I think the only solution would be some changes in SOGo, and that
>> constraints can use group membership in addition to simple LDAP filters.
>>
>>
>> Regards, Daniel
>>
>>
>>
> --
>
> https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of page