General discussion on installation and configuration of SOGo

Text archives Help


Re: [SOGo] full SAML Webmail support with Inverse liblasso


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ludovic Marcotte < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [SOGo] full SAML Webmail support with Inverse liblasso
  • Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 18:11:30 -0500
  • Organization: Inverse inc.

Hi Ben,

Good time on the SAML testing. Pretty much all outstanding SAML issues/limitations were fixed (see http://sogo.nu/bugs/changelog_page.php?version_id=149 for details) last week and testing is required.

Are you in a position to try nightly builds? There are none right now for CentOS/RHEL 7 but you could probably build your own easily using the srpm from the repo you use.

Thanks,

On 30/11/2014 02:38, Ben Webber wrote:
Hi,

I have just joined this list and am a new user to SOGo. Thanks for a
great piece of software! I have also just got it set up with saml sso.
On setting this up I encountered a few issues. One was addressed in this
post:

https://www.mail-archive.com/ /msg19097.html

I could not reply to this message as I was not a member of the list when
it was sent, so I am sending this message instead. I am running on
CentOS 7. I used this repository to get the packages:

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jaile/sogo/

I, like the others who have appeared to have done this, used this page
for guidance (it is in French):

http://wiki.auf.org/wikiteki/Projet/SOGo/TestsSAML

I needed to make the modifications described to lasso, but the patch
file that is linked on that page however is for lasso 2.3.6 and I am
using lasso 2.4.0 (this was provided by the repository linked above). I
am not a developer, but I have gone through the diff file and applied
the changes in it by hand to the 2.4.0 codebase for lasso and made a few
other changes so that it would compile. This was just guesswork so be
warned, but it seems to work so I have attached the diff to this email
for anybody else if they want to see it.

I also needed to make a change to the dovecot code so that there was
enough room in the input buffer for the saml assertion when it is
received from crudesaml. This was that I needed change
LOGIN_MAX_INBUF_SIZE to 4096 in src/login-common/client-common.h

Hope this helps someone else anyway,

Ben




This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc.
www.surfcontrol.com


--
Ludovic Marcotte

:: +1.514.755.3630 :: http://inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(http://packetfence.org)




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page