General discussion on installation and configuration of SOGo

Text archives Help


Re: [SOGo] Alternative SOGo packages repository for Debian and Ubuntu


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "\"Martin Rahnefeld\"" ( ) < >
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [SOGo] Alternative SOGo packages repository for Debian and Ubuntu
  • Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 13:35:20 +0100
  • Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.2.0 mail.inverse.ca B5B42D60373

Even the website is down. For those, who are in need of some kind of documentation:

there is luckily a recent snapshot: http://web.archive.org/web/20161021054540/http://www.openchange.org/


Am Mittwoch, Dezember 07, 2016 12:00 CET, "devteam" ( ) < > schrieb:
 
Hi!

Project openchange stopped all development.

May be somebody have ideas/solutions? @Slavek?

On 07/28/2016 01:30 AM, Slávek Banko ( ) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have experience with maintaining packages for multiple versions of Debian
> and Ubuntu distributions. Thanks to this I have ready builder for many
> versions of Debian and Ubuntu for multiple architectures.
>
> I dared to prepare an alternative repository of SOGo packages for Debian and
> Ubuntu. Packages are available not only for SOGo 3.x, but also for SOGo 2.x.
> Distributions are Debian 7 (Wheezy), Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu 14.04 (Trusty)
> and Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial). Architectures amd64 and i386. If there arises an
> interest, I can try to build also for other architectures (armhf, arm64,...).
>
> Currently, all these SOGo builds are without OpenChange support, because it is
> difficult to build OpenChange. During my attempts to build OpenChange always
> occurs FTBFS...
>
> To install gpg key, use:
> apt-key adv --keyserver sks.labs.nic.cz --recv-key A04BE668
>
> The format of the line to the apt sources is as follows:
>
> For SOGo v.2.x
> deb http://www.axis.cz/linux/debian <your-distribution> sogo-v2
>
> For SOGo v3.x
> deb http://www.axis.cz/linux/debian <your-distribution> sogo-v3
>
> Where <your-distribution> could be: wheezy, jessie, trusty or xenial. Do not
> be fooled by the word 'debian' in the url - this is true even for the Ubuntu
> packages.
>
> The packages numbering follows the usual packaging rules. By the way, packages
> are also ready to properly update during dist-upgrade, because version of
> distribution is a part of the packages version. This is a small advantage
> over the official Inverse packages ;)
>
> Cheers

--

https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

 


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.18.

Top of page